- No recently listened tracks.
Tags:abortion apologetics atheism calvinism capitalism causal determinism chicken little children christianity church climate change community culture economics environmentalism epistemology ethics evidence evil evolution faith family fellowship freedom free will global warming greek homosexuality intelligent design islam life love marriage molinism morality naturalism organic church philosophy politics pro-life reason reformed science socialism suffering
Category Archives: politics
Many protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement have roundly denounced any and all forms of capitalism as the source of all our present ills. That’s one of the reasons they chose Wall Street as the place to make their angst known.
But while they march and chant and propose lists of endless demands I can’t help but wonder, are those who are so outraged clear on who their enemy really is?
Its the wedding of a select few corporations to the government combined with a lack of accountability that is the problem. The father of capitalism, Adam Smith, was opposed to the notion of joint-stock companies which enjoy limited liability, enforced by the state (ie. the East India Company) for many of the reasons the Occupy Wall Street protesters are now upset. He didn’t believe corporations should be considered legal entities in themselves (from which we get the modern view that corporations are persons). And he was opposed to the separation of ownership and management which he rightly predicted would end up harming both the owners and managers.
So who was for this joint-stock system which has blossomed into what we have today?
Many of the Occupy Wall Street movement are openly sympathetic to socialistic notions. What those protesters likely fail to understand is that the same movement which supported socialistic economic policies also supported joint-stock companies because they believed that by allowing the common man to own stock he would have a better chance to become wealthy but in order to encourage the common man to take such a risk his liability needed to be limited. And Smith, among others, accurately predicted the problems that limited liability would produce. Its really not fair to place all the blame on CEOs for accepting golden parachutes when the real problem is that such a disconnected ownership structure provides the perfect environment in which to draft such contracts.
So if the protestors want to be consistent they need to read their history to understand that 1. capitalism is not their enemy nor the cause of the corruption they are rightly upset over and that 2. the fault does not lie solely with corporations in general (not all companies that are listed on the NASDAQ or the Dow Jones Industrial Index are evil) or even corrupt corporations but with the toxic mix of a select few corporations which enjoy government favor and protection.
What essentially needs to happen is for the Tea Party to mix their hatred of the government with the Occupy Wall Street’s hatred of corrupt businesses. I’m pretty sure the two would be pleasantly surprised at the result.
Here’s a funny video from 1949 on “What is a corporation?”
I was recently asked on Quora for my thoughts as a social conservative. Being a libertarian my answer was more or less that as long as I am afforded the freedom to disagree and openly criticize actions I consider to be immoral then I don’t mind affording others the ability to live in immoral (and irresponsible) ways.
As part of my answer I mentioned the oppression of natural marriage proponents by homosexuals and was subsequently asked to provide evidence to substantiate my claim.
Here is my answer.
The issue is how, in the quest for normalization/affirmation, “gay rights” will result in oppressive laws/regimes like the Human/Homosexual Rights Commission of Canada.
Redefining marriage will certainly affect how everyone thinks about marriage and statistical data shows that in countries where marriage has been redefined to mean nothing more than two people posessing strong feelings for one another, the number of people who get married and stay married are dismal at best.
Of course the redefinition of marriage is not the only cause behind the decline of the institution of marriage, it was already sick as evidenced by the prominance of sexual promiscuity and high divorce rates. But redefining marriage in an attempt to divorce it from its biological moorings is like adding a new sickness on already diseased animal.
As for the oppression that forced normalization/acceptance of homosexuality brings, I submit the following list as examples of what is becoming known as “homo-fascism”, a term I find quite apt and not the least bit ironic.
Please note as well that these are actual cases that have already happened, this is not a “slippery slope” hypothetical scenario. The politically corerect ship of homosexual persecution has already sailed.
- Couple faces legal action for refusing to rent a room to a homosexual couple
- Couple lose ability to provide foster care for refusing to affirm homosexuality Bonus: The courts official ruling is that their religious beliefs are trumped by gay rights (the right not to be offended?)
- Prop 8 supporters harassed
- Counseling student prevented from graduating and ordered to receive mandatory sensitivity training
- Schoolboy suspended merely for disagreeing with homosexuality (Cant have this sort of bullying going on now can we?)
- Paypal refuses to process donations to groups that don’t affirm homosexuality
- Paypal freezes the funds of people who don’t support homosexuality
- Apple removes Manhattan Deceleration from its store
- Apple removes Exodus Internal application from its store
- Forced sensitivity training for Toronto school children
- A collection of offenses
- San Diego firefighters forced to participate in gay pide parade
- Florida teacher suspended for disagreeing with gay marriage on personal Facebook page
- Ireland considers law to force clergy to perform gay marriages
- Eastern Michigan Student kicked out for refusing to affirm homosexuality (she later won her case)
- Pastor convicted of hate speech because he refused to affirm homosexuality
- The entire US Army forced to undergo and affirm homosexuality
- Deleted Wikipedia page on Homofascism with a few examples
- California school district forced to affirm homosexuality
- Marine reporter fired for not affirming homosexuality
- Contractor fired for personal views on homosexuality
- Olympic athlete forced to resign because he committed the despicable crime of supporting proposition 8
- Various ways the “it gets better” campaign founder, Dan Savage, has oppressed various people for failing to affirm homosexuality
- Google removes links to sites that aren’t gay-friendly enough
- USDA considering mandatory homosexual affirmation courses
- Another example of students being forced to affirm homosexuality (and parents being stripped of any voice in the matter)
- Businessman saddled with court costs for failing to affirm homosexuality
- Elderly harassed by police for disagreeing with homosexuality
- Shop owner in the UK forbidden from displaying Bible verses because it doesn’t affirm homosexuality
- National Post apologizes for running a pro-family ad, promises to donate the money from the ad to pro-homosexual (read: anti-family) groups
- Christian hit with 40% paycut after failing to affirm homosexuality.
- Man demoted for not affirming same sex marriage.
- Toronto schools force all children to affirm homosexuality
I’ll add more as time permits, but this should prove ample evidence that homosexual fascism is not a myth as the most popular entry in the Urban Dictionary maintains but a real problem that needs to be addressed by the homosexual community if they want non-homosexuals to tolerate their views. And please note that I am using tolerance in the way it is supposed to be used here meaning someone who disagrees with homosexuals but who doesn’t want to infringe on their right to destroy their bodies as they see fit through their unnatural sexual preferences.
So it seems that the topmost rated definition of “homofascism” on the urban dictionary which is blatently false. Homo-fascism is not overwrought or hysterical. Its a real and growing trend.
It’s amazing to me how many people think that voting to have the government give poor people money is compassion. Helping poor and suffering people is compassion. Voting for our government to use guns to give money to help poor and suffering people is immoral self-righteous bullying laziness.
People need to be fed, medicated, educated, clothed, and sheltered, and if we’re compassionate we’ll help them, but you get no moral credit for forcing other people to do what you think is right. There is great joy in helping people, but no joy in doing it at gunpoint. -Penn Jillette
Bonus: Here is a great interview of Penn by the CATO Institute:
Many people today consider government regulation to be a necessary evil. Without government overseeing greedy corporations, the thinking goes, attention to quality, and especially safety, will degrade.
It is assumed that government is the only entity with the ability and motivation to look out for the interests of everyone.
To help illustrate how faulty the notion of government regulation being our saving grace is, let’s take a look at how the Soviet Union regulated the production of its most effective propaganda outlet, the common TV set. Keep in mind that the USSR had an interest in producing quality TVs in order to govern more effectively.
Soviet television sets tended to explode, because of faulty manufacturing. The surprising and alarming propensity of Russian receivers to blow up, and by extension the apprehension it causes in Soviet viewers, was one of the stranger features of Soviet life. By one estimate, sixty percent of all apartment fires in Moscow are caused by mass-produced Soviet television sets, which hada tendency to explode. Of the 715 apartment fires in Moscow in November 1987, 90 were blamed on exploding television sets, a statistic the Soviet press viewed as an alarming commentary on Soviet technology. Police said three television models notorious for defective wiring are being removed from the market, and millions of warning leaflets have been mailed to television owners.
Its true that markets aren’t efficient (in terms of the efficient market hypothesis ), but as inefficient as they are, governments are worse. It is a fallacy to think that a small subset of the market can do a better job than the whole market in ferreting out bad products.
It was pointed out 11 years ago how time and again scientists have claimed that particular genes or chromosomal regions are associated with behavioral traits, only to withdraw their findings when they were not replicated. Findings linking specific genes to complex human behaviors all were announced with great fanfare; all were greetedwithout skepticismin the popular press; all are now in disrepute. Nevertheless, considerable grant money has been available in this country for research seeking to show a genetic basis for homosexuality. Researchers now openly admit that after searching for more than 20 years, they are still unable to find the gay gene.