- Daniel Kahneman – Chapter 27 - Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman 5 hours ago
- Daniel Kahneman – Chapter 26 - Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman 5 hours ago
- Daniel Kahneman – Chapter 25 - Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman 5 hours ago
- Daniel Kahneman – Chapter 24 - Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman 6 hours ago
- Daniel Kahneman – Chapter 23 - Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman 6 hours ago
Tags:abortion apologetics atheism calvinism capitalism causal determinism chicken little children christianity church climate change community culture economics environmentalism epistemology ethics evidence evil evolution faith family fellowship freedom free will global warming greek homosexuality intelligent design islam life love marriage molinism morality naturalism organic church philosophy politics pro-life reason reformed science socialism suffering
Daily Archives: September 6, 2011
I came across a Facebook friend’s post which declared “Right-wing commentator: Poor people voting is ‘un-American’”
Since the liberals who were commenting on the story appeared to completely miss the point that the commentator was getting at, I decided to help them out:
Oppression should be opposed regardless of who the oppressors are or who they happen to want to oppress. This goes for rich oppressing the poor through the purchasing of government favors with their dollars just as much as it does the poor oppressing the rich through the purchasing of government favors with their votes.
Its not so much that the poor shouldn’t be allowed to vote, its that the poor shouldn’t be allowed to vote for the legalized plundering of others.
Liberals love to invoke class warfare and since they assume that terms like “rich” and “poor” are prescriptive of a static group of people and not descriptive of a temporal economic state, the notion that “the poor” could ever oppress “the rich” is simply unheard of. Simply put, they are operating from Karl Marx’s playbook where “the poor” are likely to rise up and overthrow their capitalistic masters any day now.
It may be apocryphal, but it still fits:
A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that the voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on they will vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury. -Alexander Tyler, University of Edinburgh history professor in 1887
So in a sense the liberal characterization of the conservative commentator is right. Letting poor people vote is, indeed, un-American if what they are voting for is to legally plunder the rich, or anyone else (like common taxpayers like myself) for that matter.