<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Love thy enemies</title> <atom:link href="http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies</link> <description>Faith strengthened through evidence.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Wes Widner</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-358</link> <dc:creator>Wes Widner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:34:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-358</guid> <description>So we&#039;re back to your definition of &quot;love&quot; being devoid of any disagreement, anger, or discussion/debate/argument. I don&#039;t see how disagreement, or &quot;being rude&quot; in itself requires a separation or lack of love per se.
Could I have handled it differently? Sure. And I wholly accept that.
However you seem to think that my disagreement with my fellow brethren on a third-tier doctrinal issue at best (in other words, its not an issue that separates us as brethren) somehow disqualifies me (from what?).
I&#039;ll let you have the last word as you seem to believe several things that aren&#039;t so. 1.) That the truth claims of Christianity are logically tied to the person presenting them, namely me. 2.) That your personal opinions constitute a constraint upon me such that I &quot;ought&quot; to obey your made-up rules of morality and 3.) That I believe that my attitude (or &quot;people like me&quot;) is what really holds you back from the truth.
No, you have had your mind made up long before you stumbled across my blog. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we&#39;re back to your definition of &quot;love&quot; being devoid of any disagreement, anger, or discussion/debate/argument. I don&#39;t see how disagreement, or &quot;being rude&quot; in itself requires a separation or lack of love per se.</p><p>Could I have handled it differently? Sure. And I wholly accept that.</p><p>However you seem to think that my disagreement with my fellow brethren on a third-tier doctrinal issue at best (in other words, its not an issue that separates us as brethren) somehow disqualifies me (from what?).</p><p>I&#39;ll let you have the last word as you seem to believe several things that aren&#39;t so. 1.) That the truth claims of Christianity are logically tied to the person presenting them, namely me. 2.) That your personal opinions constitute a constraint upon me such that I &quot;ought&quot; to obey your made-up rules of morality and 3.) That I believe that my attitude (or &quot;people like me&quot;) is what really holds you back from the truth.</p><p>No, you have had your mind made up long before you stumbled across my blog.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wes Widner</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-360</link> <dc:creator>Wes Widner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:38:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-360</guid> <description>Actually, I&#039;m feelin&#039; pretty good today :-) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#039;m feelin&#039; pretty good today <img
src="http://reasontostand.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?9d7bd4" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: UnaffiliatedGuy</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-359</link> <dc:creator>UnaffiliatedGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:38:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-359</guid> <description>You are a sad, sad man. Goodbye Wes. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a sad, sad man. Goodbye Wes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: UnaffiliatedGuy</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-357</link> <dc:creator>UnaffiliatedGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:25:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-357</guid> <description>C&#039;mon man. You don&#039;t need the bible to know that bashing your own &quot;brothers&quot; is morally wrong, not to mention rude. Wes, they are on your side. They are your christian brothers. Yet you verbally attack them like that? If you can&#039;t get along with your own fellow christians, why in the world would a person like me ever listen to you? You&#039;ve lost your credibility. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#039;mon man. You don&#039;t need the bible to know that bashing your own &quot;brothers&quot; is morally wrong, not to mention rude. Wes, they are on your side. They are your christian brothers. Yet you verbally attack them like that? If you can&#039;t get along with your own fellow christians, why in the world would a person like me ever listen to you? You&#039;ve lost your credibility.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wes Widner</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-356</link> <dc:creator>Wes Widner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:07:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-356</guid> <description>Sorry you feel that way.
I&#039;m curious to know, though. What objective moral standard are you using to judge me by or are you merely expressing your personal preference/opinion? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry you feel that way.</p><p>I&#039;m curious to know, though. What objective moral standard are you using to judge me by or are you merely expressing your personal preference/opinion?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: UnaffiliatedGuy</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-354</link> <dc:creator>UnaffiliatedGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:03:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-354</guid> <description>Sorry dude, not me. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry dude, not me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: UnaffiliatedGuy</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-355</link> <dc:creator>UnaffiliatedGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:03:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-355</guid> <description>Apples and oranges, my friend. You went on an absolute nutball tirade, namecalling all sorts of your fellow believers. And then you have the gall to post something on loving your enemies? Your calvinist brothers were right.....you really went completely off the deep end. It was quite a spectacle. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apples and oranges, my friend. You went on an absolute nutball tirade, namecalling all sorts of your fellow believers. And then you have the gall to post something on loving your enemies? Your calvinist brothers were right&#8230;..you really went completely off the deep end. It was quite a spectacle.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wes Widner</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-353</link> <dc:creator>Wes Widner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:17:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-353</guid> <description>Dave Harris, is that you? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Harris, is that you?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wes Widner</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-352</link> <dc:creator>Wes Widner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:11:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-352</guid> <description>So, in your view love is the absence of all conflict, disagreement, and anger?
I certainly hope you aren&#039;t a parent who attempts to raise your offspring with that kind of &quot;love&quot;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in your view love is the absence of all conflict, disagreement, and anger?</p><p>I certainly hope you aren&#039;t a parent who attempts to raise your offspring with that kind of &quot;love&quot;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: UnaffiliatedGuy</title><link>http://reasontostand.org/archives/2010/04/05/love-thy-enemies/comment-page-1#comment-351</link> <dc:creator>UnaffiliatedGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:52:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://reasontostand.org/?p=1144#comment-351</guid> <description>Wes, Wes, Wes. You of all people shouldn&#039;t be blogging about loving your enemies.  This post from a man who wrote ...  &quot;  That might work if Dr White wasn&#039;t such a prick..&quot;  Ouch! But that was only the beginning of your tirade. Whew! Glad I&#039;m not a christian anymore!!!  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/buzz/109631075847576113329/h4BBfmiFaNV/RT-mrjgardiner-erguncaner-DrOakley1689-Brothers&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/buzz/109631075847576113329/...&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes, Wes, Wes. You of all people shouldn&#039;t be blogging about loving your enemies.  This post from a man who wrote &#8230;  &quot;  That might work if Dr White wasn&#039;t such a prick..&quot;  Ouch! But that was only the beginning of your tirade. Whew! Glad I&#039;m not a christian anymore!!! <a
href="http://www.google.com/buzz/109631075847576113329/h4BBfmiFaNV/RT-mrjgardiner-erguncaner-DrOakley1689-Brothers" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/buzz/109.....29/&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 12/24 queries in 0.527 seconds using apc
Object Caching 463/478 objects using apc

Served from: reasontostand.org @ 2012-02-08 21:48:38 -->
